philaretus
♡ 17 ( +1 | -1 ) cheetahLosing a piece without compensation against a player of bishop_vlad's strength is tantamount to loss of the game. I would certainly have resigned in pawnrider's position.
cheetah
♡ 14 ( +1 | -1 ) ok, a whole knight down. I understand that at this level a material disadvantage is fatal. At my humble level I can be two rooks down and win :)
macounet
♡ 43 ( +1 | -1 ) resignhi, i'm a french guy (excuse if my english is a little bad)
when you lose a piece, you may keep on playing, hoping your oponent to make the same (or a worse) mistake.
but i think it's not the goal of a game.
i know that a great champion said that a game is not lost until the last move, but i consider that playing until the checkmate, is quite an offense. when the game is lost, it's lost.
triangulator
♡ 29 ( +1 | -1 ) you should quitif you are down material against a good opponet, playing will only make you more tierd(in otb games) for your next game and is offencive. here on GK I think if you are odwn a peice you should quit against someone higher than you playing on acheives nothing